tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post3725894503109872920..comments2022-11-02T15:12:35.022+05:30Comments on Sachinandcritics Blogs: Sachin's tons and the critics' percentage analysis blunder!പിപഠിഷുhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05402427017579379438noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-6096573518527777142013-10-08T17:50:33.156+05:302013-10-08T17:50:33.156+05:30sachin is the symbol of cricket & his name is...sachin is the symbol of cricket & his name is enough for everyone to know him who is he.Sachin serve india 23 year.i wish his coming series against WI will be good. To know more visit:- <a href="http://bit.ly/1a4n2aI" rel="nofollow">God of Cricket</a> Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14341863318172997187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-11648416475846716522013-10-08T17:36:47.472+05:302013-10-08T17:36:47.472+05:30This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14341863318172997187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-41131194842692144002013-07-14T02:05:24.271+05:302013-07-14T02:05:24.271+05:30vineet.......mathematician must be your surname an...vineet.......mathematician must be your surname and that tooby mistake cos you are a dumbo in maths..........so much has been said about yout stupid calculation that I can insult you any more.......so simply keepyour potty mouth shut.<br /><br />Khud bat utha nahin sakte baat karte hain bhagwan ki...bhagwan bole to Khuds yahin appna sachin .....justgooglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03909741927590679241noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-66992581776742572812013-07-03T02:19:14.550+05:302013-07-03T02:19:14.550+05:30O vineeth bhai.... chalo jawo jitna mathematical b...O vineeth bhai.... chalo jawo jitna mathematical bomb fodna hai... apne gf ko sunwo... aur bhago yaha se Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17210902659210968085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-19767472277171327512013-05-24T19:20:05.939+05:302013-05-24T19:20:05.939+05:30Again...if Sachin scored 16 centuries and India lo...Again...if Sachin scored 16 centuries and India lost, it just shows dat he got no support from any of his team mate...stil he did his job perfectly..!!<br />how can u blame d master for dat??<br />instead blame other team mates...remember cricket is a team game...<br />Dis statistics just shows dat how strongly d master stands in d pressure situations!!Bijeshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14747161141059408114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-18036807198681281642013-05-24T19:16:40.871+05:302013-05-24T19:16:40.871+05:30vineeth..dont speak like an idiot..!!
"I was...vineeth..dont speak like an idiot..!!<br /><br />"I was merely pointing out to a flaw in an arguement "Sachin has more match winning centuries than xyz has centuries". That statement is purely based on the fact that he has more centuries than anyone else. With such large numbers he is more than likely to have had a higher number of centuries in match winning games."<br /><br />It seems sachin's number of centuries is troubling u..The master blaster scored dese much centuries bcoz of his clas..no player reached near to it...dis means master stands well above other players...!!<br /><br />The fact is dat Tendulkar's match winning hundreds r more dan any other player's total hundreds!!Bijeshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14747161141059408114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-31528242839433906992013-05-24T00:55:21.625+05:302013-05-24T00:55:21.625+05:3018/22 vs 33/49 is still not a valid comparison Mr....18/22 vs 33/49 is still not a valid comparison Mr. Mathematician Vineeth...Valid comparison is when d denominator matches with that of 'The DELIMINATOR'(Sachin SIR)..49!!!!!the Denominator shows his greatness...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00015828352029627203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-63912213461005250522013-05-23T22:51:17.263+05:302013-05-23T22:51:17.263+05:30great article brother.... loved ur sarcastic take ...great article brother.... loved ur sarcastic take on the GOD haters!! keep it up!!! SACH FOR LIFE!!!The game called lifehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05924394603477668347noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-89147951676959615542013-04-04T22:28:14.575+05:302013-04-04T22:28:14.575+05:30Hey Vineeth, Come on dude, Why you people are look...Hey Vineeth, Come on dude, Why you people are looking into the negative side of his achievements, I don't know, am basically a zero in mathematics and I have no idea why you are giving such a big time blunders here, you wanna prove that you are a better mathematician than us, or is that just a show off to prove that you are a mathematical genius, Sachin is playing to win matches and no one plays to loose games. Please don't question the commitment of a person who played for the country for more than 23 years, just for the sake of getting few claps from Sachin haters.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03986257064273063871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-4795491034098886852013-04-04T22:09:27.859+05:302013-04-04T22:09:27.859+05:30Once again... to hell with ur mathematical analysi...Once again... to hell with ur mathematical analysis mr. Vineeth. :) :)<br /><br />So what u say is India lost those 16 matches bcoz of Sachin's ton? whats Sachin's fault in that? EXPLAIN!പിപഠിഷുhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05402427017579379438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3491087785358075498.post-17569074791875018512013-04-04T21:58:19.012+05:302013-04-04T21:58:19.012+05:30Wow. The amount of butthurt on a one year old post...Wow. The amount of butthurt on a one year old post is astounding.<br /><br />First of all, I wasn't undermining Sachin's achievement. I love Sachin and respect his contributions.<br /><br />I was merely pointing out to a flaw in an argument "Sachin has more match winning centuries than xyz has centuries". That statement is purely based on the fact that he has way more centuries than anyone else. With such large numbers he is more than likely to have had a higher number of centuries in match winning games.<br /><br />Second of all, Venkatesh Prasad scored 1 century and it was match winning doesn't hold because of sample sizes and statistical significant. 18/22 vs. 33/49 is a valid comparison because of the denominator. 33/49 vs. 1/1 is not a valid comparison - again denominator.<br /><br />18/22 vs. 33/49 IS actually statistically significant. I was merely pointing out the mis-representation in the statement "Sachin has more match winning centuries than xyz has centuries". I'm not anti-Sachin. I'm just anti mis-representation of numbers.Vineethhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02096575640743494724noreply@blogger.com